“Were the Indians Noble Savages?”: Don Boys Puts the Arguement to Rest.

February 5, 2008 at 7:10 pm 16 comments

According to the brilliant scholar of the history of Native American peoples, Don Boys–a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives– it is obvious that the First Peoples were much better off with European settlement than before. This fine scholar–and himself a noble gentleman of high standing–has pounded the final nail into the coffin of ‘Liberal‘ thinking and their fruity admiration of Native people’s philosophy and lifestyle. Thank God for people like Don Boys who make our world a better place, filled with understanding and acute, intellectual missives such as his brilliant essay called Were the Indians Noble Savages?

This is a gentleman who has obviously spent most of his life studying the nuances of the First Nations. It must be true! In order to make statements like he has he must have spent an immense amount of time studying these people.

Let’s take a look at some of the more important sections of his argument:

“Columbus had arrived. He delivered civilization to this continent–and all that went with it, good and bad. As the Indians began to stir from a sound sleep, Columbus was nearing the island of San Salvador.”

This is his first salvo of brilliance. Within a simple three sentences he has stated his intentions for the rest of his article. ‘He delivered civilization to this continent…” From this it’s obvious that there was no civilization previous to the arrival of Columbus; all the people, all the cultures, all the tribes had no civilization! If Don Boys writes it, it must be true.

The next sentence, “As the Indians began to stir from a sound sleep, Columbus was nearing the island of San Salvador,” is a little more subtle in nature, although just as powerful. With this one sentence he has proven what White People have known, but have been unable to prove, for centuries. It’s obvious that Europeans, represented here by Columbus, are a much more industrious people and have a better work ethic than Native Peoples, as while the lazy Natives were still sleeping soundly–we can extrapolate from Don Boys’ brilliance that they slept for over 12 hours a day– that the civilizing Europeans were already on the move, changing and affecting the world! Well done, Don. Well played.

A few paragraphs on we get to:

“The “noble savage” is a product of imaginative writers with humanistic leanings. Many of the Indians were brutal savages, even cannibals!” And a little further on in the same paragraph, “Yes, some Indians kept slaves and ate them during hard times! Wonder why you weren’t taught that in public schools?”

This is a nice move. Native Peoples were indeed brutal, what with their wars and their slavery. They even had the gall to kill their slaves!! Unbelievable! What kind of people would have slaves and even kill them? When Europeans arrived in North America they put a quick end to slavery and the killing of slaves; that’s what I call Civilization In Action!

Now, you might be thinking something like, “but didn’t Americans have slaves? Didn’t they even have this huge civil war due in large part to the fact of slavery?” True, but you’re not thinking right (which means you’re not thinking like Don Boys). You see the slaves of Native Peoples were other Native Peoples, or a slavery of, relatively, their own people or people of an equal value. That’s horrible!

Whereas the American concept of slavery was based on using people of lesser value. Africans. Africans who, I’m sure Don Boys would agree, had no civilization either, and therefor the act of slavery actually was a way to promote civilization in this childlike race. Slavery, when done right, is a good thing.

Now it is true, and likely, that some peoples did practice cannibalism. From accounts I’ve read it is usually associated with ritual–warriors would eat the hearts of their enemies to absorb their power–rather than an act of having a hankering for human flesh. Off hand I can’t remember any examples of cannibalism for the sake of a yummy snack, although I’m sure it did happen. I mean if European explorers wrote accounts about it, it must be true, because propaganda is a modern invention and was not around in any form previous to the 20th century.

“Indians are alleged to have been preservers of pure air, water, and the forests while modern Americans are made to feel guilty for highways, homes, and hospitals. We are told this is not progress. I suppose deer trails, wigwams, and kids dying by the thousands are preferable!”

Nice move! What idiot would argue that hospitals are a bad thing. Native people’s had no knowledge what-so-ever of medical value. I’m surprised Don Boys didn’t explain how if a Native person had a cold the rest of the tribe would just kill him, using the reason that he was probably going to die anyway.

Then they would eat the corpse.

People are people everywhere and I’m sure that there would have been many Natives who would have built smog inducing factories if they could have. But there weren’t any. And it’s impossible to believe that Native People could have been more in tune with Nature than Europeans. I mean we’ve already proven that they had no civilization, right! If a people have no civilization, then what are they? A part of nature? Bullocks!

“The factory spitting out smoke is supposed to be obscene and a blight on mankind but a smoking factory is a beautiful sight. It means jobs, money, bills paid, and food for children, gifts to charities, higher Gross National Product, and a higher standard of living for most people.”

This paragraph is pure poetry. It is a well known fact that artists–poets, painters, photographers, musicians–love to make art about smoking factories, because it is such a beautiful sight. Factories mean jobs, and create them from the factory floor to the above mentioned hospital–due to weak people with respiratory issues needing advanced medical attention. Without factories there would be no food, because we need factories to put the food into cans so we can buy it from supermarkets. I mean, nobody eats fresh food from farms anymore–that’s just stupid. Without factories we wouldn’t be able to pump up our GNP, which creates a greater standard of living, which allows us to afford nice houses in which to barricade ourselves and filter out the, as I like to call it, Civilizing-Smog-Of-Progress!

“Yes, I choose smoking factories to silent, dark factories because I love people better than I do clean air. If I have to choose between an unobstructed view of a field of buttercups and a housing development, I will choose the houses every time. While being interested in cleaning up the environment, let us not become fanatics and follow the self-serving hypocrites in that movement who use the concern of sincere people to “feather their own nests.” “

I love people more than clean air too. I mean, who needs clean air when we have hospitals and advanced medicine to lessen the effects that are, purportedly, caused by factories? And we don’t need fields of buttercups. We don’t need forests. Hell, let’s just dam the crap out of everything and flood all these useless, wasted lands. People don’t need these things when we are busy working in our factories. We work in these factories so we can live in our houses and get good night’s sleep so that we can go back to the factory the next day. Don Boys understands that if there are interesting places to go to–to visit and see and hike through and have a picnic in and so on– that this will only distract the worker from making profits for the rich people. We don’t want that, do we Don!?!

And forget the animals and vegetation that live on these lands; OUR lands. Screw-em. If they can’t be civilized what use are they to us, right Don? Stupid, uncivilized, grizzly bears. They deserve to die.

“Before getting into the Indians’ story, I need to “clear out the underbrush” so we can see the forest. One writer wrote of white men who “took over their [Indian] world,” but where did he get the idea that this world (America) belonged to the Indians? Need I remind you that merely living on the land does not confirm ownership? The Indians had lived here for hundreds of years but were still living in crude homes; eating and warming themselves over an open fire; and letting their old people die alone without help.”

This paragraph starts strong: Clear out the underbrush! This is an allusion to the fact that forests don’t know how to take care of themselves and therefor civilized-human intervention is needed.

And where, exactly, DID people get the idea that Native peoples owned the land, just because they were here first! That’s stupid. And all those treaties that were written up which recognized Native rights to land–that our civilized European sensibilities were wise enough to ignore over time–were just exercises in creative writing. They are a fun read nowadays, but were obviously meant to just be enjoyed as literature, and not to be taken as a bond based on the honour of the White Man. As Don would tell us, I’m sure, might is right, and that’s all that counts.

And these miserable, uncivilized people with their crude long houses, crappy art forms and open fire pits–which are an obvious violation of safety standards–what they hell right do they have to the land that they were living on? Land is there to be built upon, and land with no modern building on it is a blight to civilized people everywhere! Don’t forget that if we don’t build things then our GNP is going to suffer! If these people really wanted to prove that they owned this land they should have built factories. By not building factories they forfeit any claim on land ownership.

“They had access to all the gold, silver, iron, water, trees, etc., that the white man had, yet it was the white man who built the greatest, most advanced society in the world. If that sounds like racism, so be it. It is also factual. Most Liberals don’t like facts; they like fantasy or faith in old, discredited theories that informed people discarded years ago.”

Couldn’t they see the value of gold? I mean, what can’t you do with gold. Think of all the fine jewelery that these people were missing out on. And although Don doesn’t state it, it’s obvious that the definition of what a great, advanced society is, is based on factories. The more factories, the more advanced a society. No factories = stupid. It’s a fact, you lazy-assed, hippie liberals! How many liberals do you see building factories? None! They’re too busy looking at fantasies, such as treaties signed by Native Peoples, and spreading disinformation, unlike more conservative types like you and I, right Don?

“If the white man had not beached his boats on the sands of Jamestown, Plymouth Rock, and Cape Cod, the Indians would still be huddled around their soot-lined tepees warming themselves over a fire made by rubbing dry sticks together. They would still be burying their dead children because of childhood diseases, and maybe the air would be cleaner if the white man had never come, but who would be alive to care? “

This paragraph is so obviously true that I can’t think of anything to add to it. I mean write a history that never happened and state it as the unequivocal truth. Why not; we have factories.
Don writes several more paragraphs, talking about South American societies, and if you want to read it then go to the source. I’m done because, quite frankly, Don has won me over.

So, to summarize:

Native people are lazy, stupid and not very industrious.

Factories are the best thing since sliced bread.

Native People, in fact, really never owned the land–because they didn’t build factories– and we can consider them to be place holders for Europeans.

Slavery is subjective.

Nature is stupid.

Non-Europeans are stupid babies.

And Don Boys sure knows how to write a compelling argument.


Entry filed under: canadian, Canadian/American relations, Conspiracy, culture, humour, international, nationalism, native issues, opinion, politics. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Canadian Sweets Murphy’s Law: Still Alive and Doing Just Fine.

16 Comments Add your own

  • 1. underdog  |  February 5, 2008 at 7:27 pm

    how do you get a pHd appealing to such a low brow audience?

  • 2. C. Fraser  |  February 5, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    That’s a very good question! I was wondering that myself.

  • 3. Amelie  |  February 5, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    I wish I could sleep 12 hours a day and make crappy art forms near an open fire.

  • 4. C. Fraser  |  February 6, 2008 at 12:10 am

    At least 12 hours a day. Maybe 13 hours on weekends.

  • 5. Amelie  |  February 6, 2008 at 4:43 am

    In pijama pants? mmmm. pijama pants.

  • 6. chvnx  |  May 19, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    I need to get this book.

    Egalitarianism and historical revisionism in the name of political correctness are destroying the very fabric of traditional Canadian culture. European culture.

    It’s about time that we started looking at the world through the eyes of a realist and break the Marxist chains that have been holding us back from real social progression.

  • 7. MARK YORK  |  June 19, 2008 at 5:56 pm


  • 8. C. Fraser  |  June 19, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    I didn’t think I was being too subtle. Yes, it was sarcasm. I thought the original article was horrible propaganda.

  • 9. Bill Jenkins  |  October 13, 2009 at 2:04 am

    I suggest if you feel bad at what happened to the natives of North America after Columbus and subsequent people landed here, please find a tree to hang yourself from and make the world a better place.

    You won’t be adding CO2 to contribute to global warming, you will not add future generations of people that will subjugate poor victims of society, etc.

    Please, kill yourself for the good of the planet.

    • 10. C. Fraser  |  October 13, 2009 at 2:45 am

      Wow. Congratulations! I hand you the award for most nonsensical reply so far!

      Well done.

      Seriously. Take a look at your logic, or lack thereof, and get back to me. Then perhaps we can have an actual discussion.

  • 11. Robin Ewers  |  January 3, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    You are over republicanized

  • 12. eyesopen  |  September 8, 2011 at 1:37 am

    True ignorance, europeans are roaches of the world, your progress brings death to us all and your living in the moment now is what makes you simple minded creatures. You do not care what happens to your children as long as you have the luxeries of technology now. And with all that we didn’t do, we didn’t endanger species we lived amongst them, we didn’t destroy nature we were nature, we made the most out of life by being with our families 24/7, you can’t stand to be with your family for a few hours, you want to be business men, we’re family men. We are closest to the creator and you continue to pull yourself further away. Good luck to you and yours in the afterlife. I can’t believe this stuff is on the web.

  • 13. joe  |  February 4, 2012 at 7:21 pm

    About the Indians, finally somebody says it. Most were nothing more than glorified cave men barely entering the bronze age, life expectancy was very low. They were not peaceful tree huggers, most tribes prided themselves on having a hunter-warrior culture, and were exterminating each other over land for thousands of years before the big bad white man arrived. The reason why most settlers did not like them or feared them was for good reason, many tribes would kill the men and children, rape the women, cut babies out of pregnant women, skin people alive, etc (this was all before the french taught them about scalping, or even arrived in this hemisphere), So when a bunch of people from Europe see this kind of barbarism or experience it in the form of dead, or mutilated loved ones you can guess what their attitude towards the natives would be.

    Liberals, stop whitewashing history, and Native Americans or whatever you preferred to be called, stop lying to people about your history. Take your history with all the bad things that went along with it like the rest of us Americans or Canadians have to.

    • 14. abby  |  February 20, 2012 at 6:40 pm

      i did not know that they killed children.raped women.cut babies ut of pregnant women,skin people alive,eat people?

  • 15. abby  |  February 20, 2012 at 6:27 pm

    The Native Indian americans were misunderstood,it was not their fault.They werent greedy but modest people who lived a simple nomadic lifelstyle.This is very stereotypical,the white ameicans were greedy and the only bad thing they did was scalping and even that wasnt their fault as it was a belief.They never started the fight,they just fought back for their land.its just the way they were bought up

  • 16. Julie Mitchell  |  May 1, 2013 at 7:45 am

    The industrious vikings called the natives Skraelings, which essentially means lazy heathen. So Boys is not alone in this contention. Those who saw it first hand knew the truth as well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Random Sources of Humour

Humor-Blogs.com Humor Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory Blogerella

Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: